731 results for 'cat:"Employment Discrimination" AND cat:"Employment Retaliation"'.
J. Neeley finds the county court properly granted the dept's. plea to the jurisdiction. The female African American former employee filed suit after being denied employment for a position from which she had resigned. She was eventually rehired and filed civil rights charges with the Texas Workforce Commission, alleging she was retaliated against, and that the dept. did not comply with a settlement agreement. The court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the negligence claim does not fall within the tort claims act's limited waiver of immunity, the state is immune from the claim for breach of the settlement agreement, no prima facie claim for retaliation was stated, and the state is not the employer pursuant to the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Neeley , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 12-23-00204-CV, Categories: Jurisdiction, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Neeley finds the county court properly granted the Department of Health and Human Services' plea to the jurisdiction. The black, female former employee filed suit after being denied employment for a position from which she had resigned. She was eventually rehired and filed civil rights charges with the Texas Workforce Commission, alleging she was retaliated against, and that the department did not comply with a settlement agreement. The court lacks subject matter jurisdiction because the negligence claim does not fall within the Texas Tort Claims Act's limited waiver of immunity, the state is immune from the claim for breach of the settlement agreement, no prima facie claim for retaliation was stated and the state is not the employer pursuant to the Texas Commission on Human Rights Act. Affirmed.
Court: Texas Courts of Appeals, Judge: Neeley , Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 12-23-00204-CV, Categories: Jurisdiction, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Bennett grants the police department’s motion to dismiss this employment dispute brought by a former Black police officer alleging race discrimination, hostile work environment, retaliation, Monell, and violations of civil rights and the Maryland Fair Employment Practice Act. The police department alleges the employee failed to exhaust her administrative remedies and her complaint is time-barred after an investigation was opened on her for a fight while off-duty. The court finds her EEOC charge was filed in timely manner, her Title VII claims appear to be time-barred. Her complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, but she has 15 days to file an amended complaint.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Bennett, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv2215, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Leinenweber denies the defendant behavioral therapy provider’s motion to dismiss ADA discrimination claims brought by an autistic former employee. The court finds the former employee has sufficiently alleged that she was demoted, and then pushed to quit, by the company’s unwillingness to accommodate her needs as a person with autism.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Leinenweber, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv3707, NOS: Amer w/Disabilities - Other - Civil Rights, Categories: Ada / Rehabilitation Act, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
Want access to unlimited case records and advanced research tools? Create your free CasePortal account now. No credit card required to register.
Try CasePortal for Free
J. Quereshi denies, in part, the United States Department of Treasury and a supervisor in this employment dispute brought by a former employee claiming national origin discrimination, retaliation, hostile work environment and constructive discharge. She alleges numerous times she was assigned more work than other coworkers, ignored, criticized, insulted by her supervisors and not selected for promotions before her forced retirement. The employee is granted leave to file an amended complaint with the appropriate details of her discrimination, hostile work environment and constructive discharge claims.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Quereshi, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 8:23cv1699, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Kness partially grants the Illinois Department of Corrections’ motion for summary judgment on an older Black employee’s claims of age and race discrimination, and retaliation for union association. The employee, who oversees several parole officers, claims his spotty disciplinary record with the department is the result of systemic ageism and anti-Black racism and departmental retaliation for his efforts to unionize his office. The court finds most of the employee’s discrimination claims either untimely or lacking sufficient evidence, but also finds there is sufficient evidence to support his claim for union activity retaliation against several specific department personnel.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Kness, Filed On: May 8, 2024, Case #: 1:18cv282, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation, Labor / Unions
J. Moon grants the city's motion for summary judgment in an employment discrimination suit. A female firefighter sued the city, claiming she experienced discriminatory treatment from her superiors and that her superiors opened a retaliatory investigation into her conduct, resulting in her demotion. There is no evidence of her employers treating male coworkers differently; they, too, are required to provide a doctor's note if taking sick leave, and there is no evidence of them making statements about women not belonging in the fire service. A feeling of disrespect is not a substitute for evidence of discriminatory treatment.
Court: USDC Western District of Virginia, Judge: Moon, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 6:23cv32, Categories: employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Newman grants the police department's motion for summary judgment, ruling the police officer's age discrimination claim fails. The younger officer used as a comparator did not commit the same type of misconduct and, therefore, is not similarly situated, while a supervisor's single comment about "younger officers" during disciplinary proceedings does not constitute direct evidence of discrimination. Meanwhile, the retaliation claim also fails as a matter of law because the fitness for duty evaluation required before the officer could return to work was not an "adverse employment action," especially considering the officer blamed several mistakes that led to his suspension on the stress of his job.
Court: USDC Southern District of Ohio, Judge: Newman, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv96, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Richardson grants the defendant company’s motion for summary judgment in this case brought by a former employee asserting certain state-law employment related claims, including retaliatory discharge under the Tennessee Workers’ Compensation Law and discriminatory discharge under the Tennessee Disability Act. As to the former employee’s two claims, which both stem from his termination, the court concludes that there are no issues of fact and that the employer is “entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
Court: USDC Middle District of Tennessee , Judge: Richardson, Filed On: May 7, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv87, NOS: Other Labor Litigation - Labor, Categories: Employment, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. AliKhan largely grants the employer's motion for summary judgment and denies the employee's cross-motion for partial summary judgment in her suit alleging that the employer failed to accommodate her disabilities and cut her hours and threatened to terminate her for taking medical leave. Summary judgment is denied to the employer as to claims related to failures to provide an ergonomic chair and desk and related to the employer's requirement that the employee recertify her FMLA leave. It is otherwise granted.
Court: USDC District of Columbia, Judge: AliKhan, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 1:19cv1766, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Saylor denies in part several funds and their chairman’s motion for summary judgment against their former administrator who is being sued for breach of fiduciary duty and has asserted counterclaims for sexual harassment, creating a hostile work environment, retaliation for reporting harassment and failure to accommodate her Type 1 diabetes. The chairman repeatedly behaved inappropriately and made sexual comments to the administrator, such as telling her that he wanted her and had a crush on her and that his wife wasn’t taking care of him, attempting to kiss her against her will immediately after screaming and swearing at her after she gave told him his behavior made her uncomfortable, and if the breasts of an employee on medical leave for breast cancer were “any good.”
Court: USDC Massachusetts, Judge: Saylor, Filed On: May 3, 2024, Case #: 1:21cv10163, NOS: Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) - Labor, Categories: Employment, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Hollander grants the university’s motion to dismiss this employment dispute brought by a former Black assistant professor alleging retaliation, race discrimination and hostile work environment claims. Her teaching contract was not renewed after making a complaint to human resources regarding a supervisor directing her to work five days a week, but she could not because of a daycare situation. She fails to include allegations related to the retaliation claims, making it inconsistent with the discrimination claims for the exhaustion requirement.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Hollander, Filed On: May 1, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv2272, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Kirsch finds that the lower court properly found for the city on a female employee's gender discrimination claims. The employee does not identify adequate male comparators to support her equal pay and sex discrimination allegations, nor does she show that she engaged in protective activity to support a retaliation claim. Rather, the city presents a reasonable explanation for believing her performance inadequate in support of its decision to fire her. Affirmed.
Court: 7th Circuit, Judge: Kirsch, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 23-1761, Categories: employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Mehalchick denies a borough’s motion to dismiss an age and disability discrimination claim brought by a former police officer who says he was forced to retire. The former police officer’s allegations were plausible because he was over 40, qualified for his job, hearing-impaired and replaced by a younger employee.
Court: USDC Middle District of Pennsylvania, Judge: Mehalchick, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 3:23cv912, NOS: Civil Rights - Habeas Corpus, Categories: Civil Rights, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Rowland partially grants a health care analytics company’s motion for summary judgment on one of its former employees’ discrimination claims. The former employee says the company refused to accommodate her depression, anxiety and Sjögren’s Syndrome, then fired her in retaliation for taking FMLA leave. The court finds the former employee has sufficiently alleged her disability discrimination, failure to accommodate and retaliation claims, but grants the company judgment on her FMLA interference claim. The court also denies the company’s motion for sanctions.
Court: USDC Northern District of Illinois, Judge: Rowland, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 1:22cv1612, NOS: Amer w/Disabilities-Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Ada / Rehabilitation Act, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Bennett grants Sherwin-Williams’ motion to compel arbitration and stay of the proceedings in this employment dispute brought by a former paint mixer who alleges race discrimination based on a failure to rehire claim. The paint mixer argues that the arbitration agreement was outside of the scope of his claims and not valid. The court found the arbitration agreement to be valid and enforceable, delegating the threshold issue of arbitrability to the arbitrator.
Court: USDC Maryland, Judge: Bennett, Filed On: April 30, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv3190, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Arbitration, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Dick grants a request by the state department of corrections, dismissing on procedural grounds the Title VII complaint of a fired black prison lieutenant, a 20-year veteran. He alleges he was fired for his use of force on an inmate, but a white captain who allegedly committed equal or greater violations of department police in the same incident, got to keep his job. The lieutenant’s claims of racial bias favoring the white captain fail because employees of different rank or status cannot be similarly situated.
Court: USDC Middle District of Louisiana, Judge: Dick, Filed On: April 26, 2024, Case #: 3:22cv897, NOS: Other Civil Rights - Civil Rights, Categories: Civil Procedure, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Bloom approves a state commission’s motion to dismiss employment discrimination claim by a former employee who alleged he was harassed and fired due to a disability that made him fall asleep on the job. Because the former employee took no action for more than two years after initiating the case, he did not make a good faith effort to serve notice, as required.
Court: USDC Middle District of Pennsylvania, Judge: Bloom, Filed On: April 25, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv1820, NOS: Civil Rights - Habeas Corpus, Categories: Civil Rights, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation
J. Cooper partially grants the television network's motion to dismiss its former Capitol Hill producer's suit alleging that he was fired for opposing false reporting of voter fraud and inaccurate coverage of the January 6, 2021 riot at the U.S. Capitol. The producer has not plausibly alleged that he was discriminated against because of his political affiliation, since a D.C. law barring such discrimination narrowly defines "political affiliation" as membership in or endorsement of a political party. He also has not alleged that he was terminated as a reprisal for political activity, nor cited an established policy that the network violated by firing him. While he purports that the network's stated reason for firing him, failing to show up to work when he called in sick, was pretextual, he has plausibly stated a claim of retaliation under the Sick Leave Act because of that stated reason for termination.
Court: USDC District of Columbia, Judge: Cooper, Filed On: April 24, 2024, Case #: 1:23cv3401, NOS: Employment - Civil Rights, Categories: Employment, employment Discrimination, employment Retaliation